Morse is taken seriously ill at a museum reception and is hospitalized. In the hospital, Supt. Strange, visits Morse to push him to take early retirement, while Dr. Millicent 'Millie' Van Buren gives him her book on a 140 year-old court case known as the Oxford Canal Murders. The case involved the murder and rape of a young woman, Mrs Joanna Franks, traveling by canal boat from Coventry to London. The case resulted in three boatmen being sentenced to death and two of them hanged. Morse starts to read Millie's book and dreams about it. He soon has a number of problems with the case. Why weren't the three men also charged with theft Why did Mrs Franks take a boat instead of a train that was much faster and comfortable and only slightly more expensive Why didn't she abandon the boat after she complained about lewd behavior of the crew at the shipping office in Banbury Why did she then drink and 'socialise' with the crew What happened to her 'carpet bag' with which she arrived on the boat but which was not mentioned in the court case, nor was it stored in the archives with her, almost empty, trunk The trunk was marked with initials of her first husband who had died. How did it happen that her shoes were found on the boat but nobody saw her return to the boat from the forest PC Adrian Kershaw does some brilliant leg work for Morse. He studied history and has invaluable background knowledge. For instance, he mentions that the boatmen had bad reputation because they worked on Sundays and did not attend church. Later a chapel was built for them in Oxford. The dead woman's clothes and the shoes found on the boat are submitted to modern forensic investigation. The result is that the shoes did not belong to the dead woman found in the water because she was much taller.The shoes were never used in the forest. Only Mrs Franks' husband, Charles Franks, was called to identify the body of the dead woman. He claimed that, while her face was darkened and disfigured, he found a birth mark behind her ear. The prosecutor welcomed that information that only a husband or a lover would know. The accused were not shown the body. The defense attorney merely claimed that the guilt of the three men was not proved. All three accused claimed to the end that they were innocent. One of them was not executed because he embraced Christianity in prison. Morse instructs Kershaw to investigate if Charles Franks benefited from his wife's death and, indeed, he pocketed 300 pounds insurance money. Case closed Charles Franks murdered a tall women and dropped her in the canal after meeting Joanna in the forest. If Joanna Franks jumped off the boat at the same time as the dead body hit the water, she swam to the bank and joined her husband. The couple changed their names, in the case of 'Charles Franks' a second time after he 'died' as Joanna's first husband. The fourth boatman, a youngster who was not charged, was probably paid by Joanna to give false testimony. Morse travels to Ireland and has a grave of Joanna's first husband exhumed. The coffin contains bags of sand and some stones.
摩斯探长第十一季主要在哪里取景?还是牛津吗?
是的,尽管 Morse 住院戏份增多,但本季依然深度扎根于牛津及其周边地区。著名的基督学院、博德利图书馆等地标仍是重要背景,同时为了配合《村姑之死》的剧情,剧组也前往了一些典型的英国乡村外景地拍摄。这些场景不仅提供了悬疑氛围,更强化了牛津大学学术传统与地方犯罪之间微妙冲突的主题。
为什么有人说摩斯探长最后几季太压抑?
很多观众认为第十一季之后的《摩斯探长》基调明显变暗,充满了宿命论色彩。Morse 的健康问题贯穿始终,加上案件本身涉及的死亡与背叛主题,使得整部剧弥漫着一种挥之不去的悲伤氛围。这种压抑感并非制作缺陷,而是编剧有意为之,旨在真实反映一个天才侦探在肉体衰败和精神孤立下的最后挣扎,引发了关于衰老与尊严的深度共鸣。
情节老套是这部影片硬伤,观影不久便能猜中后续走向,如同嚼蜡般缺乏惊喜,难以勾起深入探究欲望。
可惜角色塑造流于表面,过于脸谱化,好人一味善良、坏人纯然邪恶,缺失深度挖掘,难以给人留下深刻印象。
观影全程如坐针毡,冗长拖沓、乏味剧情,加上糟糕视觉听觉呈现,既无娱乐价值,更谈不上艺术熏陶。
部分情节的发展较为平淡无奇,但整体上并不影响观影感受。
作为一个路人,本来对《摩斯探长第十一季》没抱太大期望,但看了后就被吸引住了。剧情轻松有趣,又不乏正能量,是一部很下饭的剧。